Revisit the 1964-1965 World’s Fair at DORIS

Promotional card distributed by corporate participant, Sinclair Oil, 1964 New York World’s Fair.

The 1964-1965 World’s Fair began as an idea floated by lawyer Robert Kopple in 1958.  In August, 1959 Mayor Robert F. Wagner declared that 1964 would mark the 300th Anniversary of the establishment of New York City to be commemorated by holding a World’s Fair. (This was before City government determined that the City’s actual origin date could be traced to the Dutch colonists who occupied the region and established government operations in 1624.)  

An exhibit in the lobby at 31 Chambers Street, showcases highlights of the 1964-65 World’s Fair. The display draws heavily on brochures, reports and maps from the Municipal Library’s vertical file collection. The “vertical files” contain new clippings, handouts, media releases, leaflets and other documents that librarians compiled and stored in vertical file cabinets. The files on the 1964-65 World’s Fair are extensive. File folders in alphabetical order ranging from Accommodations to Women document both the 1939 and 1964 Fairs. The exhibit also includes items from the Municipal Archives, including donated ephemera such as a Sinclair Oil dinosaur.

Proposed exhibit for corporate participant, Sinclair Oil, 1964 New York World’s Fair.

The Fair ran for two years, April 22 through October 18, 1964, and April 21 through October 17, 1965. Industrial and technological changes premiered at the Fair included color television, push button phones, and air conditioning. If you ask New Yorkers of a certain age what they recall about the 1964 World’s Fair, a flood of fond memories are disclosed. The 1964-65 fair conjures futuristic images, modern inventions and youthful excitement for those who attended. Some remember it as a monument to a less-troubled city and country. Others hold a less positive view of the Fair.

Sinclair Oil dinosaur mascot, plastic model, 1964 New York World’s Fair.

In The Power Broker, for example, author Robert Caro characterized it as Moses’ last grasp at immortality. It was a way to achieve a bigger goal:  “. . . a dream out of his youth that had remained bright in his old age—a dream of a great park, the greatest in New York City, the greatest within the limits of any city in the world, the ultimate urban park, rus in urbe supreme, a park worthy of being named “Robert Moses Park…. The Fair, he realized at once, might at last be the means to achieve it. For the site of the Fair, like the site of the dream, was the Flushing Meadows.”

Brochures, 1964 New York World’s Fair.

According to Caro, ever since the 1920s, Robert Moses had envisioned turning the ash heap in Queens into a large park. In the mid -1930s he had a chance when the trio of federal, state and City governments funded park infrastructure to create the 1939 World’s Fair:  The World of Tomorrow. Projected to reap a $4 million profit for the City that would fund a ribbon of parks throughout Queens, and managed by Grover Whelan, the Fair was a financial disaster. Most of the exhibits and buildings constructed for the event were bulldozed and debris littered the post-fair site which soon became overgrown and swampy. After World War II it was under consideration as the location for the United Nations, despite its deteriorated condition. The next evolution was the proposed 1964 World’s Fair with a theme, “Peace through Understanding.” 

Quite a lofty sentiment but one that did not suffuse the multi-year build or the Fair itself.  

Souvenir plate. 1964 New York World’s Fair.

In 1959, Mayor Robert Wagner petitioned the federal government for authorization to hold the Fair in Flushing Meadow Park, formerly the site of the 1939 World’s Fair. The federal government approved the proposal. The governing body for world’s fairs (nowadays called Expos), the Bureau Internationale des Expositions, rejected the proposal because it violated rules on timing and location. Moses didn’t help matters. As a result, European countries boycotted the Fair, except for Spain.  

This did not deter Robert Moses who had become the President of the World’s Fair Corporation, forcing Kopple out. Moses focused recruitment efforts on the rest of the world. Ultimately, the Fair’s 144 attractions included pavilions from 80 countries, 24 States and 350 companies, trade associations, organizations and religions.

Fair is Fair, sheet music, 1964 New York World’s Fair.

Twenty-four African countries showcased various cultural traditions in the pavilion dedicated to that continent. France, Denmark, Sweden and Greece were represented by commercial associations showcasing their wares. Swiss engineering was well-represented by the Sky Ride. The government of Israel declined to participate; a coalition established the American-Israel Pavilion. Close by, the Kingdom of Jordan displayed the recently discovered Dead Sea Scrolls and a poem decrying the status of Palestinian refugees which triggered substantial outcry and protests.   

General Motors “New Futurama” show and the Vatican’s display of the Michaelangelo sculpture Pieta were enormously popular. In Futurama, riders floated through various scenes imaging the ocean, desert, and city at a future point, showcasing new inventions. The “It’s a Small World” show produced by Pepsi Cola along with the Disney Corporation collected an entry fee, none of which actually went to UNICEF.  Ford Motors debuted a new car: the Mustang.  And Sinclair Oil’s dinosaur symbol was omnipresent. The beauty products manufacturer, Clairol, offered women older than 16 an opportunity to peer into a big plastic bubble for the purpose of receiving an analysis of the person’s best hair color.

Almost all of the pavilions were temporary structures, demolished at the end of the Fair in 1965. Remnants of the Fair still exist in Flushing Meadow Park. They include the Unisphere, the New York State Pavilion, the Hall of Science and Industry, the Terrace on the Park, and the Marina, which was constructed especially for the Fair. The NYC Pavilion is now the home of the Queens Museum.  

Schaefer Beer, a Brooklyn brewery, sponsored a “Resturant of Tomorrow” along with a beer garden and exhibit on brewing in the F&M Schaefer Center. In addition to this pastel drawing, the Municipal Archives collection includes several plans in various formats for this pavilion. Schaefer was boycotted by the Congress for Racial Equality (CORE) for discriminatory practices. 1964 New York World’s Fair.

The Fair opened at the height of the Civil Rights movement. The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. had delivered his inspirational I Have A Dream speech at the March on Washington in 1963. A coalition of Americans, led by the Urban League, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), and the Congress for Racial Equality (CORE) were organizing around the country for the right to vote, leading to the enactment of the Voting Rights Act in 1965. 

The Clairol Building in the Industrial Area offered a hair color analysis to women over the age of 16. 1964 New York World’s Fair.

New York City was not immune from the battle for civil rights. The “Freedom Day” school boycott in February 1964, rent strikes, protests against employment discrimination, a six-day uprising after a detectives shot a young man in Harlem had all ratcheted up pressure for the City to address racial inequity. The Fair offered an opportunity to respond to demands for fair and equal employment, quality schools, substandard housing, discriminatory pricing, among other issues.    

Site map, 1964 New York World’s Fair, Flushing Meadow, Queens, New York.

In early April, the Brooklyn chapter of CORE announced a “stall in” at which drivers would run out of gas or otherwise have their automobiles incapacitated along the five roadways leading to the Fair. The protest was opposed by CORE national leader James Farmer, but the local activists persisted. On opening day, the City deployed more than 1,000 police officers along the highways. Despite the local organizing, and perhaps because of City government’s threats, very few drivers participated, and the “stall in” was unsuccessful. But protests continued throughout the duration of the fair, including pickets at the Florida exhibit at which four young women were arrested for holding illegal placards and trespassing. Regular protests occurred at the Schaeffer Brewery location, protesting employment discrimination.

New York State Pavilion, color rendering. 1964 New York World’s Fair.

Speaking at the opening of the Fair in 1964, President Lyndon Baines Johnson addressed the Fair’s theme:  Peace Through Understanding.

“This fair represents the most promising of our hopes. It gathers together, from 80 countries, the achievements of industry, the wealth of nations, the creations of man. This fair shows us what man at his most creative and constructive is capable of doing.

But unless we can achieve the theme of this fair--"peace through understanding"-unless we can use our skill and our wisdom to conquer conflict as we have conquered science--then our hopes of today--these proud achievements--will go under in the devastation of tomorrow.”

Student protestors drowned out portions of the President’s speech by shouting chants of “Freedom Now” and “Jim Crow Must Go” to the dismay of the leaders assembled for the event.

Even Dr. Ralph J. Bunche the Under-Secretary for Special Political Affairs at the United Nations had complaints. He wrote Governor Nelson Rockefeller about the limited representation of Black people in the film shown at the New York State Pavilion. The Governor defended the film, exhibiting a lack of awareness. For example, for the section depicting the City’s nightlife, he wrote “. . . in the section showing New York City at night, there are shots taken of chorus lines in two night clubs and the Rockettes . . .  there is at least one Negro girl included in the Rockettes shown in the film.”

Aerial photograph of Flushing Meadow Park, 1961. New York World’s Fair Corporation Report #1, May 8, 1961.

Like its predecessor, the 1964-65 World’s Fair was not a money-maker. Moses and the Fair Corporation had projected a $53 million surplus in year one which would be used to repay the City, investors and to fund improvements to Flushing Meadow Park. Instead, the Fair ultimately operated at a loss. In July, 1964, a confidential letter to business and media executives called the Fair a fiasco. Only 27 million people visited the fair in its first year, far short of the 40 million promised by Moses.

Aerial photograph of Flushing Meadow Park, 1964. New York World’s Fair Corporation Report, January 1965.

The Department’s exhibit New York World’s Fair 1964-65 will be open to visitors through March 2026. The exhibit uses photos and ephemera from the Municipal Archives and Library collections to highlight key exhibits and features of the fair. 

The symbol of the World’s Fair, the Unisphere, rose 140 ft. above a reflecting pool.

Socialists on the City Airwaves

The recent election and swearing-in of Zohran Mamdani a member of the Democratic Socialist Party was not the first socialist or progressive—of one persuasion or another—to run for elected office in the city. Mayor David Dinkins, for example, was also a member of the Democratic Socialist Party. Mayor Mamdani’s victory, however, offers an opportunity to look back at some of the socialist voices New Yorkers have heard over WNYC, the City’s municipal radio station, across the decades.

Before 1938, many candidates, would have found it difficult to gain access to the City’s airwaves at all. WNYC’s director at the time, Christie Bohnsack, largely followed the lead of the Tammany Hall political machine, which tended to lump progressive movements together under a broad—and pejorative—“red” label.

BPS 12625: WNYC Director Christie Bohnsack (in bowtie, far right) at a reception at the WNYC studio in the Municipal Building, July 31, 1929. Mayor Jimmy Walker is at the microphone. Photograph by Eugene de Salignac, Department o Bridges/Plant & Structures Collection, NYC Municipal Archives.

Change began with Mayor Fiorello H. La Guardia’s second term in 1938. La Guardia had run with the support of the relatively new American Labor Party (1936-1956), a nexus of labor leaders and former Socialist Party members who rebranded themselves as the Social Democratic Federation.

La Guardia appointed Morris S. Novik as director of WNYC. Novik arrived from WEVD, a station owned and operated by the progressive Jewish Forward and founded by the Socialist Party as a memorial to its late leader, Eugene Victor Debs. The connection was unambiguous—and not lost on La Guardia’s opponents.

Daily Worker article about lefty teens on WNYC, from August 29, 1940.

Within weeks, critics seized on a WNYC travelogue that painted an unusually rosy picture of the Soviet Union while avoiding criticism of Joseph Stalin’s dictatorship. The broadcast touched off a political storm, complete with calls to shut down the station and a formal investigation. The controversy eventually collapsed when it was revealed that the program had been produced by a subsidiary of the American Express Company as a piece of travel promotion. Still, the episode appears to have had a chilling effect.

Left-leaning voices were not barred from WNYC after that, but Novik seems to have been cautious about offering airtime to overt socialists or communists. One notable exception came in August 1940, when the station aired a program featuring five young members of junior lodges affiliated with the Communist Party-influenced International Workers Organization (IWO). The Daily Worker reported the teenagers spoke out against a proposal for a military draft, responding to a group of youths who had endorsed a national call-up on Youth Builders a week earlier.

No recordings of explicitly socialist programming from this period survive in the Municipal Archives’ WNYC lacquer disc collection. Newspaper radio listings from late October 1944 and 1945, however, do note a couple of broadcasts titled “Socialist Labor Talk” and “Socialist Party.” These election-season talks include an appearance by Joseph G. Glass, the Socialist Party candidate for mayor.  

Darlington Hoopes in 1952. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

Running for Mayor In 1949, and in his earlier campaigns, Congressman Vito Marcantonio campaigned on the progressive American Labor Party line. As such he was included among equal time broadcasts. While such broadcasts were not uncommon because of the FCC provision and leased time, Socialist and Communist Party officials were also heard occasionally in 1930s and 1940s on the major national commercial networks CBS, NBC, and the Mutual Broadcasting System.

The earliest surviving WNYC recordings featuring socialist speakers date well after Novik’s tenure and continued to air under the FCC’s equal-time provision. In October 1952, Darlington Hoopes, the Socialist Party’s candidate for president, addressed issues of affordability and economic insecurity, criticizing both Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and Harry Truman’s Fair Deal. Hoopes argued that the socialist model pursued by Britain’s Labor Party offered a path seriously worth considering.

That same year, WNYC listeners also heard from the leading socialist candidates running for U.S. Senate in New York. Socialist Party candidate Joseph Glass used one broadcast to distinguish his views from those of Nathan Karp of the Socialist Labor Party (SLP) and Michael Bartell of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP). All three contenders appeared on Campus Press Conference, where newsmakers faced questions from a panel of local college newspaper editors and reporters.

In the November 5th program, moderated by a young Gabe Pressman, Glass argued for cost-of-living adjustments to Social Security and maintained—reluctantly—that communist aggression in Korea needed to be resisted.

Karp of the SLP appeared two days earlier, focusing primarily on party doctrine rather than specific policy proposals. While a bit strident here, he reportedly mellowed in later years and did stand-up comedy at SLP conventions and meetings.

Bartell of the SWP, the Trotskyist candidate, appeared on October 28, 1952. He began by laying out a basic definition of his party as a revolutionary socialist one achieving its goals through democratic means.  The balance of time was spent responding to questions about the Korean conflict, the Soviet Union, China and the Berlin blockade. In his last few minutes Bartell called for an end to an economy based on military armament, a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Korea, and the abolition of the Smith Act. This law imposed criminal penalties for advocating the overthrow of the U.S. government by force or violence and required all foreigners over the age of 14 to register with the federal government.  

Norman Thomas, 1937. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons

In January 1953, prominent American Socialist Norman Thomas delivered the address “What Are We Voting For?” at the Cooper Union Forum. The talk was distributed nationwide through the National Association of Educational Broadcasters’ tape network—the first non-commercial radio syndication system, initiated by WNYC.

In this talk Thomas decried our vote for electors over the popular vote, and the role played by southern white supremacist Democrats blocking civil rights legislation. He argued that on average, there are not large differences between Republicans and Democrats. His answer, in part, is what he called a “democratic socialist party.” Thomas also called for international control over atomic weapons, campaign finance reform, and transparency over “the fog of words.”

Thomas,  a serial Socialist Party candidate for President (1928-1948), would be heard over the municipal station another six times as part of the Cooper Union’s Great Hall series of talks between 1953 and 1964. He also appeared on WNYC’s broadcast of The New York Herald Tribune Book and Author Luncheon in 1964, where he addressed civil rights, nuclear disarmament, and poverty, while warning progressive listeners against political fatalism.

In 1957 “Mrs.” Joyce Cowley, a rare woman candidate with the anti-Stalinist Socialist Workers Party, ran for New York City Mayor. A year earlier she had been a candidate for the New York State Senate. She echoed much of what had been said by Bartell but did emphasize the need for civil rights. She also demanded the removal of the SWP from the Attorney General’s list of subversive organizations. Cowley called for an end to nuclear weapons tests, production for peace, not war and charged that the Democratic Party had conspired to keep the SWP off the ballot.

Michael Harrington portrait photograph from the dust jacket of The Other America. Courtesy Wikimedia Commons.

Although the Democratic Socialists of America would not be founded until 1982, the phrase “democratic socialist” appeared sporadically in 1920s and ‘30s news reports, particularly in reference to Europe, but slowly came into more frequent use during the Cold War. In the 1960s and ‘70s, Norman Thomas and writer and activist Michael Harrington often self-identified as democratic socialists to signal a clear rejection of Soviet communism while maintaining a socialist critique of capitalism. Harrington’s usage of the phrase in the 1960s and ‘70s helped cement “democratic socialism” as a recognizable label in U.S. political discourse.

Michael Harrington, a member of the American Socialist Party and head of the League for Industrial Democracy, appeared on the city’s station in 1968. In an interview with Patricia Marx he discussed his influential book The Other America, which exposed the persistence of poverty and inequality in postwar America.

Many socialist ideas—variously labeled, constrained, and contested—have surfaced repeatedly in New York City’s political life and on its municipal airwaves, even during the Cold War period of intense suspicion and retrenchment. The evolution of those voices over WNYC reflects not only shifts in the political climate but also broader debates about democracy, economic justice, and legitimacy in public discourse. Mamdani’s victory suggests that many arguments on behalf of the poor, working class, and disenfranchised, once relegated to the margins, have reentered the civic mainstream, carrying with them a history that is longer, and more complex, than current headlines may suggest.

Andy Lanset (retired) was the Founding Director of the New York Public Radio Archives.

Welcoming Home the Troops, 1945

Recently, Municipal Archives conservators began treating an oversize scrapbook of photographs taken in 1945. Located in the Grover Whalen papers, the evocative pictures capture the spontaneous joy expressed by New Yorkers as they welcomed home their sons and daughters and victorious war-time leaders.  

Thousands of spectators lined the streets as General Dwight D. Eisenhower and his motorcade traveled through the City, June 19, 1945.  Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Known as the City’s “Official Greeter,” Whelan led the Mayor’s Office for Receptions to Distinguished Guests, a.k.a. the Mayor’s Reception Committee, from 1918 to 1953.  

On June 19, 1945, just six weeks after hostilities in Europe ceased, Whalen and Reception Committee staff organized a reception for General Dwight D. Eisenhower. According to news reports the following day, crowds estimated at a half million gave a rapturous thank you to “Ike” as his motorcade made its way from LaGuardia Airport in Queens, to Manhattan, traveling down Fifth Avenue and Broadway and up the Canyon of Heroes. After a brief ceremony at City Hall and a luncheon at Gracie Mansion, Eisenhower’s motorcade brought him to a baseball game at Yankee Stadium. His whirlwind day concluded with a banquet at the Waldorf-Astoria. News articles noted that New Yorkers mostly ignored instructions from City officials to hold off on showering the victorious leader with paper, then still needed for the war-effort.  

Baseball fans gave General Dwight D. Eisenhower a standing ovation as his motorcade entered Yankee Stadium, June 19, 1945. The Yankees played the Boston Red Sox. The Sox won, 1 – 0. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

French war-time leader Charles F. De Gaulle greets the crowd from the steps of City Hall during his ticker-tape reception on August 27, 1945. Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia stands to his left at the microphones. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives. 

Two months later, on August 27, the Reception Committee let New Yorkers express their gratitude to the French leader Charles F. De Gaulle. Soon after, on September 13, the Committee organized a ticker-tape parade and welcome home ceremony for General Jonathan Wainwright. The Committee again used their considerable skill to stage welcome home events for Admiral Chester Nimitz on October 9, and Admiral William Halsey on December 14.

Reception Committee staff pasted pictures from the events on 30 large (18 by 24-inch) scrapbook pages; usually three or four to a sheet. They are not captioned. The paper has deteriorated but it may not be possible to remove the pictures without causing damage. For now, conservators will clean the photographs and re-house them in appropriate containers. Future digitization will provide public access.

For the Record readers are invited to review a selection of pictures from this unique artifact.

Young spectators seem awed by the passing spectacle. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Wounded service men and women watch the parade from indoors. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Thousands of New Yorkers crowded into City Hall Park to get a glimpse of General Dwight D. Eisenhower and hear his remarks during the reception on June 19, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Police officers struggle to contain the happy crowds along a parade route, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Spectators packed the sidewalk in front of the New York Public Library during a parade for returning service men and women, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives. 

General Jonathan Wainwright steps from the cabin of the ATC plane which brought him to LaGuardia Airport from Washington, D.C., September 13, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

General Dwight D. Eisenhower addressed the crowd at his City Hall reception on June 19, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Police officers struggle to contain the happy crowds along a  parade route. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

A smiling New York City police officer helps keep the crowds at bay, 1945.  Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives. 

Tanks roll up lower Fifth Avenue during a parade for the returning soldiers and sailors, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Fleet Admiral William F. Halsey Jr, Commander of the Navy’s Third Fleet in World War II needed a blanket for warmth during his ticker-tape parade on a chilly December 14, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Soldiers and sailors flank City Greeter Grover Whalen, French leader Charles De Gaulle and Mayor Fiorello La Guardia as they exit City Hall following the reception ceremony on August 27, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

A parade spectator leaps to greet General Jonathan Wainwright riding atop his limousine during the ticker-tape celebration along lower Broadway, September 13, 1945. Grover Whalen Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

New Visions of Old New York

At the end of December, the agency will close an exhibit that has been on display for the past year, New Visions of Old New York. The collaboration between the New Amsterdam History Center and the New York City Department of Records & Information Services has been the most well-attended exhibit that the agency has hosted. Those who missed the in-person display can view it at our online exhibit on archives.nyc.

Mapping Early New York, Courtesy of the New Amsterdam History Center.

Rendering of 1660 Castello Plan of New Amsterdam, James Wolcott Addams. I.N. Phelps Stokes, Iconography of Manhattan Island, 1498-1909. NYC Municipal Library.

New Visions of Old New York features historical maps, drawings, sketches, and official documents from the New York City Municipal Archives alongside newly imagined, digitally-generated content from the New Amsterdam History Center’s Mapping Early New York project. The selections represent ways in which the lives of women, enslaved people, and Native Americans intersected with the settlement created by the Dutch West India Company.

A closing event on December 11th brought together the organizers and others in the community to reflect on the exhibit. Maria Iacullo-Bird of Pace University led a panel discussion with Michael Lorenzini (of the NYC Department of Records & Information Services), Drew Shuptar-Rayvis (an Algonkian Historical Consultant for The New Amsterdam History Center), and Kamau Ware (founder of the Black Gotham Experience, which tells the oft-forgotten stories of the early Black residents of New York City).

Still image, Kierstede House. Mapping Early New York, Courtesy of the New Amsterdam History Center.


Archives Conservation Teams Up with the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Municipal Archives’ Conservation staff recently completed a major project to conserve the Brooklyn Bridge drawings collection, which consists of more than 11,000 drawing plans. With the support of a three-year Save America’s Treasures grant from IMLS and a one-year grant from the New York State Library, conservators worked diligently over a nearly five-year period to stabilize and photograph the collection. As part of the project, the Archives’ Conservation Unit collaborated with the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Scientific Research Department to conduct scientific analysis of selected drawings to determine the composition of media and paper, causes of degradation, and to use infrared imaging techniques to enhance faded writing and drawing in graphite.

East River Bridge, “The Brooklyn Bridge Up Close.” Photograph by Elena Carrara, Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The successful collaboration also prompted the Met to mount an exhibition of seven important drawings from the collection in a joint special installation with their Education Department, which opened on December 8th. On view until February 22nd, the installation displays, for the first time since 1983, several of the large-scale presentation drawings created by John and Washington Roebling and Wilhelm Hildenbrand. The longest drawing in the collection, which depicts the full span of the bridge and measures more than 25 feet long, has never been exhibited before. Thus, the exhibition offers a rare opportunity to see these exquisite drawings in an equally exquisite setting.

Lindsey Hobbs speaking at the Metropolitan Museum of Art on December 9, 2025.

In conjunction with the exhibition, the Met invited me to participate in an “Expert Talk” on December 9th along with Marco Leona, the David Koch Scientist in Charge at the Met, and Met Curator, Elena Carrara. Open to the public, the panel spoke about the history and preservation of the collection, the scientific work performed by the Met, and the exhibition process.

Given the size of the collection, not to mention the colossal size of many individual drawings, preserving and exhibiting the collection presented numerous challenges. The Met may in fact be one of few institutions in the world that could successfully mount an exhibition on such a scale. In addition to size, the condition issues the drawings presented posed challenges for conservation, framing, and transport.

“The Brooklyn Bridge Up Close.” Photograph by Elena Carrara, Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Prior to their accession by the Municipal Archives, the drawings spent the better part of a century in a dusty carpenter’s workshop beneath the Williamsburg Bridge under the purview of the Department of Transportation and its various historical iterations, where they were often consulted by City engineers for bridge repairs and renovations. Subjected to water leaks, mold, exhaust fumes from surrounding traffic, and rough handling, the drawings took a great deal of abuse. The primary condition issues we encountered included deteriorated paper supports, discoloration, tears and abrasions, local staining, faded media, and damage from mold and degraded adhesives.

To help us better understand how the drawings were created and what specific materials and media we were dealing with, I reached out to the Met’s Scientific Research Department in July 2023 and proposed a collaboration. The Met’s scientists often collaborate with smaller institutions via their Scientific Research Partnerships program to share their extensive analytical capabilities. Their enthusiastic yes to the proposal led to several visits between our institutions and a very productive partnership.

New York Approach, East River Bridge. “The Brooklyn Bridge Up Close.” Photograph by Elena Carrara, Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The Met’s findings confirmed the presence of certain pigments, such as vermillion, Prussian blue, earth pigments, and smalt, which helped to direct the methods used in our treatment of the drawings. Awareness of the presence of specific pigments also supports guidelines for light exposure given their known light sensitivity. Other findings revealed potential agents of deterioration in the paper substrates of some of the drawings, including rosin and kaolin. Infrared imaging allowed us to read for the first time some of the many notations written by Washington Roebling on the drawings and give a clearer view of intricate details. The imaging and analysis conducted by the Met not only supported our recent treatment efforts and understanding of drawings but will continue to support preservation of the collection in the future.

The work of Archives’ conservators along with the generous support of the Met’s Scientific Research and Education Departments have yielded insights into the Brooklyn Bridge plans that would not have otherwise been possible. The collaboration has been a wonderful opportunity to support a more nuanced approach to the drawings’ treatment and to expand the Archives’ audience for this remarkable collection.

https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/the-brooklyn-bridge-up-close

On Mayors and the Counting Thereof

“A List of the Members of the City Government from its incorporation (1653) up to the present time, arranged alphabetically; with the different stations held by them in the Common Council; and also under the State and United States Government.” Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1866. D.T. Valentine, Clerk of the Common Council.

Recent news reports have suggested that New York City has been misnumbering its Mayors since the 1600s. Not that they were numbering them at that time, but ever since the City started giving official numerical designations, the numbering has gone awry.

In the 2019-2020 “Green Book,” The Official Directory of the City of New York, Matthius Nicolls is given a single entry, 1672. In truth he was Mayor from 1671-1672 and again from 1674-1675. NYC Municipal Library.

This past August, historian Paul Hortenstine noticed that the “Official” list of Mayors failed to include the second term of Mayor Matthias Nicolls (Nicoll). He had served two non-consecutive terms, the first from 1671-1672, and the second from 1674-1675. Hortenstine was not the first to notice this discrepancy. In 1989, the New York Genealogical and Biographical Society published an article by Peter Christoph revealing that every mayor after #7 had been misnumbered. As Christoph pointed out, if a Mayor had two non-consecutive terms the practice was to assign them two numbers, starting with Thomas Willett, who was Mayor #1 and #3. He noted four other early Mayors credited with two terms.

We thought the error might have been due to a little-known hiccup in mayoral history. In July 1673, the Dutch (who had established the colony of New Amsterdam in 1625 and lost it in 1664), invaded and took it back. For fifteen months the colony (renamed “New Orange”) was under a Dutch “Council of War,” that restored the Dutch-style government of a council of Burgomasters and Schepens. As a result, there was not a “Mayor of New York” between July 1673 and November 1674, when the English Governor, Edmund Andros, reappointed Nicolls. Moreover, Nicolls had not been Mayor when the Dutch invaded, his successor, John Lawrence, had assumed that role. So, by all rights, Nicolls served two non-consecutive terms with another Mayor in the middle, making him Mayor #6 and #8. Thereby moving everyone else one place down the line. Lawrence was appointed Deputy Mayor in 1674, but also served another non-consecutive term as Mayor, the 2nd time in 1691, making him both #7 and #20 (under the corrected numbering system).

Records of the Mayor’s Courts of the City of New York, entry from October 12, 1672 lists “Capt. Matthius Nicolls, May[or].” The book for the following year is missing from the historic record. Court Minutes, Volume 6, 1670 October 13-1674 November 10, NYC Municipal Archives.

On October 12, 1672, the council put forward John Lawrence and Matthius Nicolls as candidates for Mayor. John Lawrence was apparently selected but those records have been lost. , Court Minutes, Volume 6, 1670-1674, page 205.

In one of his last acts as City Clerk, David Dinkins transferred the colonial Dutch and English records of New Amsterdam and New York to Commissioner of the Department of Records & Information Services, Eugene Bockman, December 30, 1985. NYC Municipal Archives.

Christoph, in a footnote, surmised the error arose from the compiler using the “Minutes of the Mayor’s Court” as a source, and noted that a volume for the period November 1674-September 1675 had been missing for some time. In 1982, historian Kenneth Scott located the volume at the New York County Clerk’s Division of Old Records. At that time, all the earlier Dutch and English Court minutes resided with the New York City Clerk. On December 30, 1985, outgoing City Clerk David N. Dinkins transferred the entire collection of colonial-era records held by the City Clerk to the Municipal Archives. The 1674-1675 volume still resides with the County Clerk in a later series of Mayor’s Court records covering the years 1674 to 1820. However, the Minutes of the Common Council, which are also with the Municipal Archives and were published in 1905, still have a gap from 1674-1675.

After the Dutch returned New York to the English in 1674, the Mayor’s Court reconvened with Captain Matthius Nicolls as Mayor. Minutes of the Mayor’s Court, November 13, 1674-September 21, 1675. New York County Clerk.

There is yet another missing volume from these records—the volume documenting activities from October 13, 1672 to August 11, 1673. The last entry in the preceding volume, dated October 12, 1672, lists “Capt. Matthius Nicolls, May[or]” at the top. The next book in Archives possession starts on August 12, 1673, in Dutch, titled “Proceedings of the War Council of New Orange.” Those Dutch records end on November 10, 1674. The next volume begins, in English again, with Matthius Nicolls as Mayor. So, the first term of John Lawrence is missing entirely from the historical record. Some compiler must have realized this and inserted him into the history but forgot to split Nicolls’ two terms.

Proceedings of the War Council of New Orange, starts on August 12, 1673, in Dutch. The Dutch records end on November 10, 1674, just before Nicolls was reappointed. Court Minutes, Volume 6, 1670 October 13-1674 November 10, NYC Municipal Archives.

In the 1841 edition of the Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, the clerk listed “Members of the City Council from 1655 to present.The list actually starts at 1653 and included both Dutch and English governmental structures.  Samuel J. Willis, Clerk of the Common Council, Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1841. NYC Municipal Library.

The earliest printed list of Mayors (without numbers) that we located, appeared in the first Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York 1841-1842 edition, under the authority of Samuel J. Willis, Clerk of the Common Council. The list has large gaps in the colonial period and includes a note, “there are no records during the time of the first English possession in the Clerk’s office.” The Manual, as was explained in the preface, was created because it had, “been thought expedient to enlarge the substance of the City Hall Directory... by the introduction of additional matter interesting and useful to members of the Corporation....”

The first Manual listed “Mayors,” members of the City Council, and the Dutch colonial government officers of New Amsterdam. The Manuals became more widely associated with then Assistant Clerk and future Clerk, David Thomas Valentine. During D.T. Valentine’s tenure, from 1843 to 1867, the manuals became increasingly elaborate and lavishly illustrated with fold-out maps and historical information. He reprinted the 1841 list verbatim in the 1842-1843 edition. In the 1853 edition, Valentine included “Sketches of the Mayors of New York from 1665 to 1834.” This included all the colonial English Mayors but not the Dutch leaders. It does not mention Nicolls’ second term. This erroneous list was also published in the Civil List and Forms of Government of the Colony and State of New York beginning with the 1865 edition.

There were errors and large gaps in the first published list in 1841. It not only left out the 1674 second term of Nicolls, it identifies Thomas Willet as “Major” instead of “Mayor” in 1665 and then skips to the Dutch Burgomasters in 1673. Samuel J. Willis, Clerk of the Common Council, Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1841. NYC Municipal Library.]

In the 1854, 1863, and 1866 editions of the Manual, Valentine printed an alphabetical “List of the Members of the City Government from its incorporation (1653) up to the present time...” This list included the Dutch but omits Mayor John Lawrence, an error repeated through the 1866 edition. In his 1861 Manual, Valentine also published a section called “Mayors of City,” which ignores the colonial period entirely. Instead, the list begins after the American Revolution with Mayor James Duane in 1783. The 1869 and 1870 editions contain something close to the current list of “Mayors of the City of New York” starting on 1665. However, they omitted two mayors.

“Mayors of the City of New York, 1665-1869.” Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1870. John Hardy Clerk of the Common Council. NYC Municipal Library.

The earliest known appearance of a numbered list of the “Mayors of the City of New York.” Official Directory of the City of New York, 1921. NYC Municipal Library. 

In 1918 the Official Directory of the City of New York, a.k.a. the “Green Book,” began publication under the direction of the Supervisor of the City Record. In 1921 the Green Book included a list of Mayors. In it, and all subsequent editions, until it went completely online in 2021, they reprinted and updated the list of mayors, with number designations. Up through 1936 the list was consistent. It started with Thomas Willett at #1 and finished with #98—LaGuardia. Then, starting in 1937, they added a mayor, Charles Lodwik as #21 (1694 to 1695) and bumped everyone after him up one so that LaGuardia became #99. Lodwik had also been missing from the 1869 and 1870 lists in the Manual, most likely the source for the Green Book. However, Lodwik (sometimes spelled Lodewick) had been included in the list of Mayors Valentine published in 1853 as “Charles Lodowick, Mayor in 1694.”

The insertion of Lodwik to the list in 1937 may originate with the 1935 publication of Select Cases of the Mayor’s Court as it contains two mentions of Mayor Charles Lodwik. The book also contains the first mention in print of Nicolls’ 1674 term. It states “The records of the Mayor’s Court included in this volume begin more properly with the reoccupation of the English in 1674. The new mayor and deputy-mayor, Matthias Nicolls and John Lawrence, respectively, had both held the mayoralty under the first English rule.”

Charles Lodowick, Mayor in 1694, was included in “Sketches of the Mayors of New York from 1665 to 1834,” but left out of later lists until 1937. Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1853. D.T. Valentine, Clerk of the Common Council.

Additional confusion about the number of Mayors arises from the differing forms of government during the Dutch and English colonial periods. Until 1977, the City founding date was listed as 1664. In 1977, the founding date was set as “1625” to acknowledge the year the Dutch established a colony on Manhattan. Between 1625 to 1653 the colony was under the authority of the Dutch colonial governors. In 1653, New Amsterdam incorporated under a charter and established the Dutch system of Burgomasters and Schepens, and Schout, which could roughly translate to offices of mayors, aldermen, and sheriff. These bodies decided several different functions, including criminal and civil legal matters, and municipal governance.

On June 12, 1665, the English Governor Richard Nicolls (no relation) abolished the Dutch court and established the first Mayor’s Court, naming Thomas Willet as Mayor. Willet is traditionally listed as the first mayor.

However, even if the count begins in 1665, why does the list skip the new court of Burgomasters and Schepens appointed on August 17th, 1673? Part of the answer is that the Dutch system, with two or three Burgomasters (or Mayors) serving jointly is confusing. And as noted above, part of it is that the Dutch were largely written out of the history of New York City[i] until the 1970s. Given that the first English Mayors appointed by the Governor served functions similar to[ii] their Dutch predecessors, why not include the Burgomasters in the count? If the count included Burgomasters who served multiple, non-consecutive terms, 15 additional Mayors[iii] would be on the list.

List of the Burgomasters 1653-1674 as published in the Civil list and forms of government of the Colony and State of New York: containing notes on the various governmental organizations; lists of the principal colonial, state and county officers, and the congressional delegations and presidential electors, with the votes of the electoral colleges, 1870. Hathi Trust.

The aforementioned hiccup in 1673 was not the only period in which the line of Mayors was broken. Just over a hundred years later, on June 22, 1776, the line was interrupted again when the Continental Army arrested Mayor David Matthews. He escaped from house arrest in December 1776 and returned to New York, then under British military control. Matthews retained the title of Mayor with greatly reduced power. He left the City on November 25th, 1783 (Evacuation Day). The next Mayor was appointed on February 10, 1784.

Four “Acting Mayors” get mentions, but no numbers. Green Book 2019-2020. NYC Municipal Library.

Another oddity is that when Mayor James J. Walker was forced to resign due to a corruption scandal an “Acting Mayor,” Joseph V. McKee—President of the New York City Board of Aldermen—was appointed on September 1, 1932. In the subsequent special election, McKee lost to John P. O’Brien who served for one full year, 1933. O’Brien is on the list as #96, but although McKee is noted, he is not given a number. When William O’Dwyer left office in September 1950, Vincent R. Impellitteri, President of the City Council, assumed the role of Mayor. He is counted because he won the special election in November 1950 and served a full four-year term. McKee is not the only Acting Mayor who is not counted—Ardolph Kline finished William Gaynor’s term, after the latter died on September 10, 1913 of complications from an assassination attempt three years prior.

The Green Book records two additional instances, “T. Coman” in 1868, and “S.B.H. Vance” in 1874. They are on the list but are not counted as Mayors. Thomas Coman was President of the Board of Aldermen from 1868 to 1871. When Mayor John Thompson Hoffman left office to become Governor, Coman was elevated to Acting Mayor, serving from December 1, 1868, to January 4, 1869. The next Tammany-backed Mayor appointed him to oversee construction of the New York County (Tweed) Courthouse, and he was indicted for corruption. Samuel B.H. Vance similarly ascended to Acting Mayor from the position of President of the Board of Aldermen on November 30, 1874, when Mayor William Havemeyer died. He served until January 1, 1875, when William Wickman was sworn in. Exactly four weeks. No scandals recorded.

“Mayors of the City” was another list of mayors Valentine compiled that only included post-Revolutionary War mayors. Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1861. D.T. Valentine, Clerk of the Common Council.

The count of Mayors in New York City government seems not to be determined by a uniform set of rules. Four Mayors who assumed the role by Charter mandate, but who were not elected, are not counted. In the colonial era, Mayors appointed by the English are counted. But not Dutch ones. Or “Acting” ones. Who makes up these rules?

Hortenstine has identified two additional colonial-era “Acting Mayors,” William Beekman from 1681-1683, who had been a Burgomaster in 1674, and Gerardus Stuyvesant in 1744. Neither has been listed in the Green Book and their dates in office overlap with other listed Mayors. The Municipal Archives’ finding aid to the Records of the Early Mayors, also has a numbered list of Mayors. It does not have Nicolls’ second term, or the two Acting Mayors Hortenstine identified, but it has another, Thomas Hood. Hortenstine believes that to be a transcription error however, and that it was Phillip French who assumed the office after Thomas Noell died from smallpox in 1702. The Archives list does assign numbers to Acting Mayors, and when last updated it had Bill de Blasio at #114. Adding the three missing terms, but subtracting Hood, he would be #116, making Adams #117 and Mamdani #118.

The initial question was, should Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani be counted as the 111th or 112th? But the answer has proven far more complex. The numbering of New York City “Mayors” has been somewhat arbitrary and inconsistent. Maybe he should be number 118? If the Dutch Burgomasters were counted in the same way we count Mayors serving non-consecutive terms, another fifteen would be included so the Mayor-elect might be number 133. There may even be other missing Mayors. As far as employees at the Department of Records and Information Services can tell, no government agency has been tasked with “counting” Mayors. The numbers have been more a matter of convenience. One thing for certain is he is not Mayor 111. By our current Anglo-centric numbering practice (not including Acting Mayors) it does appear that on January 1, 2026, Mayor Mamdani should be Mayor number 112.


[i] Valentine complained, in an 1867 letter, that the Dutch records “were not very attentively cared for, having been without readers for probably a century and more. No attempt had been made to translate them; and... the history of New Amsterdam... was not supposed to lie hidden in these dusty, unbound and forbidding volumes.”

[ii] It was not until the Dongan Charter of 1683 that City government more closely resembled our own, with a “common council” that consisted of a mayor, recorder, six aldermen, and six assistant aldermen. Most importantly, the Dongan Charter separated the legislative functions of the council from the two judicial courts that were established. However, the Mayor was still appointed by various governmental bodies until 1834 when Cornelius W. Lawrence was democratically elected Mayor. With the exception of Peter Delanoy who was democratically elected in 1689, during Leisler’s rebellion, a short-lived colonial uprising against Catholic English rule.

[iii] The Burgomasters were the following: 1653: Arent van Hattem, Martin Cregier; 1654: Arent van Hattem (replaced by Allard Anthony), Martin Cregier; 1655-1656: Allard Anthony, Oloff Stevenson van Cortland; 1657: Allard Anthony, Paulus Leendertseen van der Grist; 1658: Paulus Leendertseen van der Grist, Oloff Stevenson van Cortland; 1659: Oloff Stevenson van Cortland, Martin Cregier; 1660: Martin Cregier, Allard Anthony, Oloff Stevenson van Cortland; 1661: Allard Anthony, Paulus Leendertseen van der Grist; 1662: Paulus Leendertseen van der Grist, Oloff Stevenson van Cortland; 1663: Oloff Stevenson van Cortland, Martin Cregier, Paulus Leendertseen van der Grist; 1664: Paulus Leendertseen van der Grist, Cornelis Steenwyck; 1673: Johannes van Brugh, Johannes de Peyster, Ægidius Luyck; 1674: Johannes van Brugh, William Beeckman.


Sources:

American Legal Records—Volume 2: Select Cases of the Mayor’s Court of New York City, 1674-1784. Pp. 40-62. The American Historical Association, 1935. https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/viewer/854396/?offset=569061#page=55&viewer=picture&o=download&n=0&q=%22john%20lawrence%22

Andrews, William Loring: “David T. Valentine” reprinted in Valentine’s Manuals: A General Index to the Manuals of the Corporation of the City of New York, 1841-1870. Harbor Hill Books, 1981 (originally published 1900).

Christoph, Peter R., “Mattias Nicolls: Sixth and Eighth Mayor of New York.” The New York Genealogical and Biographical Society Record, July 1989: Volume 120, issue 3, pages 26-27. https://www.newyorkfamilyhistory.org/online-records/nygb-record/566-602/26

Civil List and Forms of Government of the Colony and State of New York: containing notes on the various governmental organizations; lists of the principal colonial, state and county officers, and the congressional delegations and presidential electors, with the votes of the electoral colleges. The whole arranged in constitutional periods. Weed, Parsons and Co., 1870. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009014294

Hortenstine, Paul. “NY City Mayors and Slavery: Matthius Nicolls: 6th & 8th.” 2025. Northeast Slavery Records Index. https://nesri.commons.gc.cuny.edu/matthias-nicoll-6th-and-8th/

Guide to the records of the Early Mayors, 1826-1897. NYC Municipal Archives. https://dorisarchive.blob.core.windows.net/finding-aids/FindingAidsPDFs/OM-EMO_REC0002_FA-MASTER.pdf

Valentine, David. T., et. al. Manual of the Corporation of the City of New York by New York (N.Y.). Common Council; 1841, 1853, 1861, 1866, 1870. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000054276