Sanitation

The Dog Days of August in the Municipal Library

Dog Owner’s Guide to Scooping, 1973. NYC Municipal Library.

In honor of National Dog Month, we are taking a look at the history of rules, recommendations, and practices surrounding dog ownership in NYC through the collections of the Municipal Library.

There has been a law on the books since 1859 requiring all dogs in “any street or public place, in either the cities of New-York or Brooklyn,” to be “properly muzzled, or unless being led by a chain or string” as recorded in the 1866 Code of Health Ordinances from the Metropolitan Board of Health. (This was, of course, before the consolidation of New York City’s five boroughs in 1898.)

Information for Dog Owners: Why Dogs Must Be Muzzled When at Large, 1919. NYC Municipal Library. 

In 1878, as reported in the daily City Record, Mayor Smith Ely, Jr. issued a proclamation establishing a dog pound at 16th Street and the East River, where all seized dogs would be delivered by the appointed dog catchers. Rather harshly, any dog “not claimed within forty-eight hours, and redeemed by the owner, by paying the sum of three dollars” was to be “killed and destroyed by drowning.”

A small 1919 pamphlet from the NYC Department of Health, Information for Dog Owners: Why Dogs Must Be Muzzled When at Large, cited a new sanitary code Section 17, which stated that “no unmuzzled dog shall be permitted to be … in any public park or place in the City of New York.” The reasoning for this new mandatory muzzling provision was that rabies, which was “almost always caused by the bite of rabid (mad) dogs,” was an “absolutely fatal disease.”

The 1919 pamphlet also reminded dog owners that they were required to “procure a yearly license and pay the sum of two dollars for each dog” and provide their dog with a collar bearing the license number. Failure to comply could result in seizure of the animal, followed by the same severe penalty noted in 1878: “if not claimed and redeemed within forty-eight hours thereafter, they may be destroyed.” Fortunately, while the licensing requirement remains on the books, the enforcement provision now simply states that officials may issue “notices of violation for failure to comply.” (Since at least 2017, as recorded in their annual reports, NYC shelters have completely stopped euthanizing healthy animals.)

Beginning in 1934, an amendment to the Sanitary Code specified that all dogs in public should be restrained by a leash of less than six feet in length, with muzzling no longer required. As reported in the New York Times that year, the Health Department believed this would be easier to enforce than the struct muzzling provision, and that greater compliance would reduce the then-growing number of dog bites in the city. The leash law remains in effect today, except in designated dog runs and during off-leash hours in public parks.

Annual Report, Department of Sanitation, 1946. NYC Municipal Library.

In 1918, the sanitary code was amended to require dog owners to prevent their pets from “committing any nuisance upon any sidewalk of any public street, avenue, park, public square, or place in the city of New York.” This provision, which came to be known as “curb your dog,” became the target of public campaigns beginning in the late 1930s. By 1946, according to that year’s annual report from the Department of Sanitation, there were 9,047 “curb your dog” signs placed in all five boroughs.

Pet ownership grew in the post-war period, and by 1961, the “curb your dog” campaign was deemed insufficient to address the growing piles of dog waste on streets and sidewalks. At the requests of Mayor Robert F. Wagner, Municipal Library Director Eugene Bockman compiled a report “concerning the methods used by other large cities to control dog nuisance.” While researching practices in cities across the country, he found that “very little has been accomplished elsewhere which would help New York City with its problem.” While most cities had nothing on the books beyond a leash law, Milwaukee was then going so far as to propose an ordinance that would “forbid owners to have pets anywhere in the city… except in their own premises.” This was expected to be met by “loud protests from dog lovers and the humane society.”

Annual Report, Department of Sanitation, 1952. NYC Municipal Library.

Even in NYC, according to Library Director Bockman, former Sanitation Commissioner Paul R. Screvane believed that “dogs should be toilet-trained inside the house and continue that way instead of using city streets. In his opinion, it is inconsistent with modern hygiene to allow such a mess in the streets where many children play and people walk.”

Dog Owner’s Guide to Scooping, 1973. NYC Municipal Library. 

In 1973, the city’s Environmental Protection Agency published a charmingly illustrated Dog Owner’s Guide to Scooping. While “pooper scooping” had not yet been codified into law, the small pamphlet appealed to pet owners’ “respect of property and good manners,” explaining how to clean up after ones dog with newspapers or a scoop, either homemade or purchased. A note from the EPA Administrator added, “Thanks for helping us make New York City a cleaner, more pleasant place to live.”

It was not until August of 1978 that a New York State law took effect in cities with a population of 400,000 or more, requiring dog owners and handlers to clean up after their dogs on public sidewalks, streets, gutters, and other public areas. Clipped articles from that era in the Library’s “Dogs” Vertical File highlight the controversy surrounding the new law. Those opposed to it, largely dog owners and even the ASPCA, argued that it would either be unenforceable or would lead to pet abandonment. Supporters insisted that it would change habits and create a climate of respect.

Dog Owner’s Guide to Scooping, 1973. NYC Municipal Library.

A July 28, 1978, article in the Westsider described the new scooping gadgets then on sale, as well as what must have been a short-lived, city-provided “Doggie Flush” at 207 West 10th Street—a 45-inch bowl set into the sidewalk that the owner flushed “by stepping on a conveniently located valve handle.” According to an August 2 article in the New York Times, a young woman in Greenwich Village who was openly flouting the new law intended to “read Thoreau to my cocker spaniel and teach her civil disobedience.”

A press release issued by Mayor Ed Koch in 1979, on the first anniversary of the “pooper scooper law,” announced that 1616 people had received summonses for failing to clean up after their dogs, following a 3-month grace period during which 7000 warnings had been issued. The Mayor took this as proof that the law was enforceable and noted that public peer pressure had also been effective in encouraging compliance. By 1985, on the seventh anniversary of the law’s passage, a joint statement from the Commissioners of the Sanitation and Parks Departments reported that 18,230 summonses had been issued, resulting in fine revenues exceeding $435,000. Parks Commissioner Henry J. Stern called the law “one of the best things that ever happened to New York City parks.”

Of course, as any New Yorker could tell you, the original “pooper scooper” law did not completely solve the problem. Just last week, the City Council passed an additional package of four bills known as the SCOOP (Safe and Clean Outdoor Ownership Practices) Act, aimed at combatting “rising complaints about the poop smeared across the city’s streets.”

After 9/11, as the city turned its attention to disaster preparedness, the NYC Office of Emergency Management issued a 2002 guide to Disaster Preparedness for Animals in New York City. A 2015 version, called My Pet’s Emergency Plan, is now available in multiple languages through the Library’s online Government Publication’s Portal.

My Pet’s Emergency Plan (Haitian Creole), 2015, NYCEM. NYC Municipal Library

As reliance on “emotional support” animals has increased over the last decade, the NYC Commission on Human Rights issued a 2020 FAQ about Emotional Support Animals in Housing. It explained that “housing providers… must permit residents to keep emotional support animals as a reasonable accommodation for a disability,” and that emotional support animals are exempt from “no dog” policies.

Dog bites have remained a problem in NYC into our current century. The July 2017 issue of NYC Vital Signs, a monthly publication of the NYC Department of Health, was devoted to Preventing Dog Bite-Related Injuries among New York City Residents. Vital Signs revisited the topic in April of 2026, declaring that the rate of reported dog bites to New York City residents was at a ten-year peak.

While some issues remain constant, others transform over time, reflecting changing notions about public health, animal welfare, and the nature of our relationship with our pets. The Municipal Library’s collections offer a glimpse into that evolution through laws and official reports, as well as pamphlets, newspaper clippings, guides, and other everyday documents that capture how New Yorkers have been asked to coexist with their canine companions.

Department of Street Cleaning Photographs

“You Live in the Greatest City in the World – Let’s Make it the Cleanest and Healthiest,” is the wording on the sign on a Department of Street Cleaning cart photographed around 1908. The same sign today would not seem out of place on a Department of Sanitation truck and probably would have been a reasonable exhortation two hundred years ago. Except, until 1870, the City mostly contracted-out street cleaning services.  

Rack Cart with Officer, 1908, Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

The photograph of the cart is one of approximately 300 black-and-white prints depicting Department of Street Cleaning workers, equipment, and activities dating from the 1890s to 1925. Recently accessioned by the Municipal Archives, they are uniform in size, measuring approximately five by seven inches. Each is captioned on the reverse. Originally mounted in an album, the prints have been re-housed in acid-free envelopes.

Roll Call and Inspection of Drivers, 1908. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Like many City agencies, the Department of Street Cleaning began using photography in the early years of the twentieth century to document their work. Although relatively few in number, the Street Cleaning pictures capture an essential municipal function at a time of transition from an exclusively human (and horse) powered operation to one with motorized and mechanical assistance. The many pictures of trucks, tractors, snow “scoops,” flushers, and other equipment attest to the Department’s growing reliance on machinery.

One striking feature of the photographs, especially those from the earlier time period, is the ubiquity of horses. Two recent For the Record articles, Stables and Auction Marts: Building Plans With Horses and Horsepower: The City and the Horse discussed the importance of horses to transportation, construction and recreation in the city. The Street Cleaning pictures add to that theme with an abundance of images that document how critical horses were to the Department’s mission. In addition to the many photographs of horse-pulled carts and wagons, the Street Cleaning series includes several pictures of veterinarians employed by the Department, illustrating how they cared for their equine population.

Inspection After Hook-Up, n.d. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Department Veterinarian Treating Horse, n.d. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Another aspect of Street Cleaning work that quickly becomes apparent in the pictures is snow, and the removal thereof. The snow-related images vividly illustrate the effort it took to clean snow from the streets. A 1915 survey of City departments, with budget information, shows that out of their total annual budget of $4.5 million, the Street Cleaning Department spent more than $650,000 to employ “contractors,” i.e. day laborers, mainly for snow removal. (Government of the City of New York, A Survey of Its Organization and Functions, 1915, Municipal Library.)

Fifth Avenue, 1908. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Contractors Loading Snow, 1920. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Contractor Dumping Snow into North River, 1916. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

As noted above, many of the pictures depict newly acquired mechanical equipment, obviously important to the Department as it modernized in the twentieth century. But equally apparent is the human effort needed to perform the work. “New York’s Strongest” is, and has always been, an apt motto for workers in the Street Cleaning Department. 

In addition to the Street Cleaning pictures, Municipal Archives collections include a series of photographs originating from the Department of Sanitation, successor agency to the Department of Street Cleaning in 1930. The Collection Guides provide information about this larger (35 cubic feet) collection.

The Commissioner’s Carriage Before Motorization, n.d. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Model T Ford, 1914. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

The Street Cleaning pictures have not yet been digitized, but they are available for research. In the meantime, For the Record readers can take a look at sample images from the collection. Like so many other pictures in Municipal Archives collections, the aspects that are ancillary to the subject of the photograph that add interest, e.g. the pedestrians, signs, storefronts, automobiles, and advertisements. The Street Cleaning collection is another good example.

Carts On Way to Inspection Points, n.d., Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Four-wheel Cart Used for Recruiting Help During World War, ca. 1917. Department of Street Cleaning Photograph Collection. NYC Municipal Archives. 

Mop Shaking

The Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia collection has proven time and again to be a treasure-trove of interesting material, leading to several blog posts on important topics as well as the 2022 Conference on Conditions in Harlem. A surprising entry in the collection guide is named “Mop Shaking” which lists two folders dating to 1944-1945.

Letter to Mayor LaGuardia, regarding mop shaking, November 28, 1944. Mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Letter to Mayor LaGuardia, regarding mop shaking, November 28, 1944. Mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Indeed, mop shaking violated the City’s Sanitary Code as did shaking rugs and dusters. The folders contain several complaints sent to the Mayor, many made anonymously. Consider an excerpt from a letter received at City Hall on November 4, 1944.

“I have a neighbor right next door to me who shakes her dust mop out of her front window every morning two and three times full of dirt and dust. My husband painted our apt. last week and our windows were open with white enamel paint on the wood work and this woman shook her mop out and all the dirt set right in the wet paint. My husband nearly went mad and had to take benzine and clean it all off and paint it over again….”

The frustration oozes off the paper. In response to this and other complaints, the Mayor’s staff would forward the information to the Commissioner of Health with instructions to “Investigate and Report.”

Referral to Commissioner Stebbins, Department of Health, from the office of the Mayor, November 13, 1944. Mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Health inspectors were dispatched to the address provided and, inevitably, they found no evidence of the dust shakers. Considering the chain of events, that’s not surprising. The complaint was mailed to City Hall, opened by the Mayor’s staff, circulated to the Health Commissioner, the location was added to the inspectors’ route and the inspection took place. The results were relayed to the Commissioner, who, in turn, dutifully reported back to the Mayor the absence of a dust nuisance. Little wonder since days expired between the offending incident and the actual inspection.   

Report to Mayor LaGuardia from Ernest L. Stebbins, Commissioner of the Department of Health, November 29th, 1944. Mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

Reporters seemed to get a kick out of City Hall’s efforts against the shaking of mops out of windows. One report stated that inquiries “received a gentle brush-off from city departments in a survey conducted to ascertain where and how the daunted housewife may legally clean a mop.”  The city recommended wet mopping over dry mopping and pointed to the Sanitary Code which contained a variety of prohibitions including the ban on shaking rags and mops out of windows, hanging bedding from balconies or sweeping sidewalks after 8. a.m. in much of the City. A New York Tribune headline read, “Mayor would Mop Up Practice of Shaking Mops Out Windows” and referenced Mayor LaGuardia’s radio broadcast in which he said “It is very dangerous, because nothing is more dangerous than spreading germs or dust in that manner. Besides, it is a very serious offense.”

The radio broadcast indicates how seriously the Mayor took this issue. Normally his broadcasts on WNYC ran for thirty or forty minutes. In this instance Mayor LaGuardia was in Chicago and was limited to ten minutes for his remarks. Along with reducing the exorbitant interest rates on mortgages, commercial rent, leashing dogs, stopping smoking in the subways and the hazards of gambling, he included shaking mops… “a very filthy thing to do….civilized people don’t do it.”

Mayor LaGuardia on Mop Shaking, WNYC Radio, October 15, 1944

One letter began, “I live near 180th St and the people around here think your request not to shake mops out windows is silly—all I hear is “what does he want me to do with the dust,” but Sir, judging by some of the dust coming from windows nearby one would think the owners of same were raising a victory garden under the beds.” The writer continued on to make specific complaints and suggest the dust was a cause of polio.

Another plea: “I have hesitated writing you regarding warning people not to shake their dust mops out of windows. However, it has gotten to a point where I must ask your help,” from 115 B West 168th Street, the Bronx. There was an anonymous complaint about a Mrs. Grillo in Woodside who allegedly shook her carpets.  Commissioner Ernest Stebbins reported that Grillo “was instructed not to cause any nuisance.”

“How to Clean a Mop in New York,” New York World-Telegram, October 26, 1944. Mayor Fiorello H. LaGuardia Papers, NYC Municipal Archives.

It’s actually remarkable that any violations were issued at all. Nevertheless, The New York World Telegram reported that in October 1944 two housewives were fined $5.00 each for the violation. The City even included this menace in a public service announcement that also focused on littering on the subways and sticking gum on the seats.  

Secret Courtroom of the Air, Public Service Announcement, WNYC Radio, 1940s.

The sanitary code now is administered by the City’s Department of Sanitation. The penalty for shaking or beating a mat, carpet or cloth that creates litter or dust is punished with a $50.00 fine for the first offense and $100.00 for subsequent violations. There’s no word on whether violations have actually been issued.

New Accession: Department of Sanitation Photographs

This week’s blog will show a few sample images from a recently acquired series of Department of Sanitation (DOS) photographs. The collection of approximately 32 cubic feet spanning 1900-2007, is comprised of glass plate and acetate negatives as well as prints. This series will is a great addition to the Municipal Archives’ comprehensive photographic documentation of New York City.